Informed definitions and impressions on leading remain the topic of much academic discourse. However contested, the huge bulk are in understanding with identified leading properties like Intelligence and action-oriented opinion, the demand for accomplishment and decision to advert a few. This is non to propose that all leaders will possess all of these qualities, but instead they are critical properties of a “ great ” and so “ effectual ” leader.
Despite varied definitions on leading, the one I find most relevant to this essay is one by Tichy ( 1997 ) which states that “ Leadership is the ability to see world as it truly is and to mobilise the appropriate response ”
This implies that today ‘s worlds may non needfully be yesterdays ; and that our of all time altering worlds, ensured by quickly germinating consumer demands in a Globalised universe, call for originative thought, new direction attacks and adaptative leading manner. Consequently, there has been a paradigm displacement from the traditional attack of leading to that of the modern universe. This displacement ensures the acceptance of new direction manners, whilst imparting weight to the impression that leading accomplishment can, and so, are developed as opposed to being built-in given bing planetary, direction and leading challenges.
Leadership is something everyone negotiations about but non everyone truly understands what it is approximately. Peoples aspire to be leaders but merely a few can accomplish it. To John Maxwell ( 1993 ) , cognizing how to make a occupation is the achievement of labor, demoing others is the achievement of a instructor, doing certain the work is done by others is the achievement of a director and animating others to make better is the achievement of a leader. Who so is a leader? Are these leaders born or are they made? What makes a leader different from everyone else? Is it the traits they possess, the manner they act or the state of affairss they find themselves in? Many literatures till day of the month have argues on the popular hold given their assorted sentiments to the raised inquiries. Some bookmans are of the belief that leaders are born, others argue that they could be made, while a host of others are of the sentiment that they are both born and developed. This essay looks at what leading is all approximately, its different positions and its deductions for direction development in administrations.
What is leading?
Leadership is a complex phenomenon. Scholars have different perceptual experience as to what it truly is. It is no intelligence nevertheless that there is no widely acceptable definition of leading. Scholars have come to gain this and in most of their work make mention to it. A figure of writers focus their definition of leading on personality traits or the behaviors of leaders while others study the state of affairs in which leaders act and the relationship between the leaders and their followings. John C Maxwell ( 1993 ) defines leading as influence, nil more nil less. He sees leading as the ability to obtain followings. For illustration, Winston Churchill, J F Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr, Margaret Thatcher were all leaders. To him, although they had different value systems and direction abilities, each of them had followings. To Northouse ( 1997 ) , four constituents depict what leading truly is and that is: “ leading is a procedure ; it involves influence ; occurs within a group context ; and involves end attainment ” . Another bookman Robbins ( 2003 ) defines Leadership as the ability to act upon a group towards accomplishment of ends. All the above definitions relate to that of Shackleton ( 1995 ) who sees leading as the procedure in which an person influences other group members towards the attainment of group or organizational ends ( Torrington et al 20006 ) . Furthermore, Leadership to Fiedler ( 1967 ) is directing and organizing the work of group members while Roach & A ; Behling ( 1984 ) describes it as the procedure of act uponing an organized group towards carry throughing its ends.
All the definitions above indicate that a leader is one who influences and motivate others to move in a mode that facilitates the accomplishment of ends and aims. However these definitions do non do any guess as to who a leader is. Who so is a leader? Is a leader the same as a director?
To get down with the definition of who a leader is Howard Garner ( 2003 ) perceives “ a leader as an person ( or, seldom, a set of persons ) who significantly affects the ideas, feelings, and/or behavior of a important figure of persons. John Maxwell ( 1993 ) merely states that a leader can is one who influences and inspires others. with this definitions, it is of the kernel to province that Leaderships can emerge anyplace. For illustration churches, schools, administrations. They are everyplace, from political relations, concern, to faculty members. Several influential human rights, political, concern leaders have been recognized from all domains to include the great political leader of India Mahatma Ghandi, German dictator Adolf Hitler, Fidel Castro the Communist president of Cuba, Nelson Mandela the human rights militant of South Africa, Richard Branson CEO of virgin group, Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Bill Gate the Ex president of Microsoft, Louis Gerstner the former CEO of IBM, Ted Turner the laminitis of CNN and a host of other. The inquiry here is what makes this people different and distinguishable, were they born leaders or did they develop this leading skills?
The uncertainness as to if leaders are born or made has been a major topic of discuss in the field of leading surveies for a piece now. Some bookmans are of the belief that been a leader is generic, others believe certain experiences in life mould an single. Before I go on to analyze this statements, it is imperative to take a brief expression at the assorted leading theories that have emerged in recent yesteryear. These theories have instigated the statements.
Theories of leading
Several theories of leading which emerged in the 19th and twentieth century aid in our apprehension of the construct “ leading ” . For the intent of this essay these theories have been categorised into 4 general attacks which are Trait, Behavioural, Situational, and Transformation.
The trait theory is regarded as the earliest attack used to analyze leading and it dates back to the bend of the twentieth century. Scholars and advocator of these theories attempted to place the traits such as tallness, unity and intelligence that differentiated “ the great individual ” in history from the common people. For illustration, how did Napoleon Bonaparte and Henry Ford differ from their followings? This school of idea maintains the premise that some people are born to take as a consequence of personal qualities which some others did n’t possess, therefore connoting that leading is accessible merely to a chosen few and non to everyone. The trait attack was however questioned because of its ground of unavailability and besides because there has been really small consistence in the lists of traits that assorted research has discovered.
However, Kilpatrick and Locke ( 1991 ) did look to happen some consistence around a figure of the traits saying that the motive to take ; the thrust to accomplish ; honestness and unity ; self assurance ; ability to defy reverses ; good cognition of concern were all traits still built-in and should be seen in a leader.
Yet there are restrictions to the trait theory which caused research workers to seek new waies. Ralph Stogdill questioned the Trait position of leading in the mid century after a punctilious reappraisal of rather a figure of literatures. he came to the decision that “ a individual does non go a leader by the virtuousness of the ownership of some combination of traits ” ( stogdill 1948 ) . he argued that the research carried out showed that no traits were universally connected with good leading and stated that situational factors seemed to be more influential. for illustration a military leader does non possess the same trait as a concern leader.
By the late 1940 ‘s the focal point shifted from seeking to place the interior traits of leaders to detecting their behavior. This was the outgrowth of the behavioral theories of leading which sought to understand how leaders behave instead than what they are. This attack achieved modest success as it recognised the regular relationship between leading behavior and group public presentation. Conversely, what was losing was its inability to set into consideration the situational factors that influence leading success or failure. For illustration, would martin lurther male monarch Junior had been a great civil rights leaders at the beginning of the twentieth century like he was in the 1950 ‘s and 1960 ‘s?
It was hence the failure of the behavioral theories of leading to clear up situational factors that led to the coming of situational eventuality theories of leading.
bookmans such as fred Fiedler, Robert house, Paul hersey and steven kerr all contributed to the situational eventuality theory. they discovered that leaders with the same behavioral inclinations may be successful in one state of affairs and a complete failure in another. an illustration is Winston Churchill who lead the Britain through universe war II and was voted out of power shortly after the terminal of the war. Then the transformational attack sprung forth with bookmans reasoning that a leader is one who influences his followings to travel beyond their ain ego involvements. These leaders pay near understanding to their single followings.
Having looked at the different theories of leading, the interesting statement of whether leaders are born or developed would be discussed. Are leaders Born or can they be developed?
Are leaders born or can leading accomplishments be developed?
The inquiry as to whether leaders are born or made has been one of the major debated issue in the field of leading surveies. Are at that place natural Born leaders? Can a leader be created out of person that is non a leader? Two major schools of ideas to this statement. The first school of idea argues that leaders as “ born ” . Scholars in this school are of the belief that many leaders are born with certain features which increase their leading effectivity. This scholars maintain that been a leader is generic and familial. They province that leaders in the yesteryear did non travel through any signifier of preparation and ne’er went through any preparation school. These leaders were merely born with the qualities to take. Thus they are of the sentiment that there are so born leaders who are people looked up to from an early age and are those willing to be seen or heard.
On the other manus, another school of idea is of the place that leaders can be “ made ” by developing leading accomplishments. They argue that possible leaders need to be taught how to be good leaders. Eisenhower ( 2007 ) is of the sentiment that leading can be learned. To him one quality that can be developed by studious contemplations and pattern is the leading of work forces and that leading ability is dependent on accomplishments which are learnt. To this school of idea, Leadership is non an administration sole for those who are born with it. The traits an single possesses are the natural ingredients for leading and it can be acquired and developed ( John Maxwell, 1993 ) . Maxwell is of the position that with the thrust to win there is nil halting an person from going a leader. Hence leading is developed and non discovered.
Interestingly, John Maxwell depicts four classs of leaders in his book “ developing the leader within you ” they are:
“ The prima leader is one Born with leading qualities ; has seen leading modelled throughout life ; has learned added leading through preparation and has self subject to go a great leader.
The erudite leader is one who was non born with leading qualities but has seen leading modelled most of his life ; has learned leading through preparation and has self subject to go a great leader.
The latent leader is person who has merely late seen leading modelled ; is larning to be a leader through preparation and has self subject to go a great leader.
The 4th is the limited leader. This is one who has little or no exposure to leaders ; besides has really small exposure to leading preparation but unfeignedly has the desire to go a leader ” ( John Maxwell 1993 )
From the above it is clear that there are certain factors that shape the extent to which a individual becomes a leader and they range from familial inclinations, household environment, school experiences, adversity, experience at work and preparation. It is true that some people are really born with leading qualities and some are non but both could larn to develop leading qualities through acquisition, preparation and experience. ( Conger 2004 ) .
However, it is pertinent to observe that many literatures today have come to admit the fact that certain people are born with the leading traits which must be developed overtime. Intellectuals are of the position that a born leader would ever be seeable but it is he ‘s ability to develop leading features that would maintain him on top.
I am of the sentiment that both positions of leading are right in their ain manner because some factors do come in to play like formative experiences and ownership of certain traits which influence some kind of behavior. However, I think both positions are rather incorrect because each position implies that leading is either congenital or developed. Rather than reasoning what bookmans should be looking at is how this factors whether Born or made interact with one another. Why waste clip seeking to distinguish what makes a leader different from others? What should be more practical is to follow ways in which everyone can do the most of the leading opportunities they come across. A good leader is born with the ability to act upon others but merely a existent leader can larn from others to better on himself. For illustration, do we state college professors are born or made? Well the reply is rather consecutive frontward. Every college professor is both born and made. They are partially born because of the generic factors inherent in them such as the cognition and intelligence they possess and they become made through progress instruction in specialized Fieldss.
Today, leading and leading development is seen as a important portion of any incorporate strategic, direction and human resource procedure of any administration. in recent old ages, administrations have non merely been confronting challenges and complexnesss, they besides have to get by with this challenges in an environment full of competition. therefore administrations need good leading to keep and increase effectivity which would in bend aid to derive competitory advantage.
However, the quandary in which most administrations have to undertake is whether to happen ( born leaders ) or create ( made ) effectual leaders? From whatever angle Leadership is looked, leading is really critical to modern twenty-four hours scheme and besides has either negative or positive consequence on organizational public presentation. For this ground administrations and bookmans tackle the inquiry of whether to enroll and choose leaders ( leaders are born ) or develop them ( leading accomplishments are developed ) ?
This is nevertheless difficult for an administration to make up one’s mind because people vary in their capacity to take. A few have inborn capacity ( although even born leaders would still necessitate to develop farther ) , some have none, but many possible directors have it them.
In an administration, taking the right campaigner starts with the choice procedure whether within or outside the constitution and this is done in an effort to accomplish success and better its organizational public presentation. Once administrations are convinced that they have the “ right people ” in most instances they still need to develop them. The preparation may be a little portion of an person ‘s development but it is of import if an administration wants to maintain the right set of people.
One intriguing thing to observe is that, no affair what stance an administration takes whether choice or preparation, they still spends a batch of money. Unfortunately some bookmans have argued that several administrations spend 1000s and in some instances 1000000s of lbs or dollars every twelvemonth hiring ( in some instance the incorrect ) people to take up leading places. These administrations go through a batch of processs from interviews to the usage of appraisal Centres in an effort to happen the right people to make full in direction places. The procedure and exercising involves thorough examination which administrations use to find persons that could be effectual leaders. Their hunt begins by measuring some specific demands persons must possess to make full assorted places. This demands span from cognition, accomplishments and ability which is indispensable for persons to possess in order to make the occupation satisfactorily. Once these demands have been identified, a signifier of trial is used to divide the “ wheat from the husk ” . These trials include personality traits trials which help to detect those traits that are associated with leading. For illustration traits such as the desire to take, honestness and unity, thrust and energy, intelligence, self assurance and equal cognition relevant to the occupation. Administrations such as Procter and Gamble, Shell use psychometric trials. Emotional intelligence is besides used by administrations to entree campaigners. Scholars have argued that holding basic intelligence and cognition relevant to a occupation is non the lone thing efficaciously leaders should possess, the IQ and proficient accomplishments are a must hold. this scholars assert that an person without emotional intelligence ( i.e. ego consciousness, self motive, self direction, empathy and societal accomplishments ) might be one with long term vision, great thoughts and first-class preparation but he might non be a good leader as this accomplishments are required for managerial effectivity. In add-on, Interviews are besides a manner of accessing person ‘s leading capablenesss. The usage of these interviews by houses is to assist place the leading traits such as ego assurance, verbal accomplishments and so on which an person possesses.
Consequently, those of the belief that great leaders are born maintain that administrations should enroll and choose the right set of people with these leading traits. In recent times, most administrations have moved from the traditional attack of engaging persons to a more sophisticated attack. They make usage of psychometric trials in the showing procedure and besides use the appraisal centres to enroll their concluding campaigners. The appraisal centres which makes usage of single, one on one, group and self assessment exercisings are used by administrations to see where persons can suit good. Administrations use the information gathered from the Centres and different scrutiny procedure to fit leaders with state of affairss. Assorted state of affairss require different signifiers of leading attack. If a state of affairs necessitate a alteration focussed leader, so an administration should look for an person with transformational qualities. In add-on, this administrations should inquire themselves if “ leading is really of import for certain places ”
However, holding conducted this assorted trials and interviews, what is the confidence that the campaigner finally chosen would suit into the leading function that he is been employed for? It is one thing to enroll outstanding endowments who are believed to assist heighten organizational public presentation ; it is another thing to develop persons to take up leading functions in an administration. Scholars who are in support of the thought that leading accomplishments can be developed are of the sentiment that so possible leaders are born but merely effectual leaders are made through uninterrupted preparation. We have to acknowledge though that non all people can be every bit trained. Scholars have farther argued that leading preparation is possibly traveling to be more successful with persons who are high ego proctors than with those who are low ego proctors ( Robbins 2003 ) . For illustration an administration can non direct people on a leading programmes if they do non desire to be at that place and anticipate them to be a leader. If the proposed leader is non wholly into the procedure, directing them to be “ taught ” leading accomplishments is traveling to be a complete waste of clip and resources.
Although some bookmans have opposed the preparation of people saying that it is a waste of clip and financess, it is of import to observe that administrations still spend a batch of money every twelvemonth on preparation. the engagement of leading development has increased significantly. in the UK and Europe, there has been a figure of leading enterprises. they recognise the importance of leading and have accepted it. it has besides been embedded by the foundation of Quality Management. In Education, there has been an tremendous investing in leading programmes such as the Masters in Business Administration [ MBA ] . NHS besides has its leading programme and besides a leading Centre. the constabulary service are non left out as they launched their new leading programme. Directors and those who aspire to be troughs are sent on a broad scope of leading programmes which ranges from MBA programmes, weekend retreats, and professional classs to leading seminars. There has been monolithic accent on leading in recent old ages. Although some people have disagreed to leading developing keeping that certain people can non be trained to led. to them “ you can coerce a Equus caballus to the watercourse but you can non coerce it to imbibe H2O ” . They uphold this belief that some people are non born with the right personality traits to take. Nonetheless, their statement merely goes farther to admit the world that leading preparation does be and that it is besides a multimillion dollar industry. Companies such as IBM, BP, Rolls-Royce, NHS and a host of others all spend tonss of money on leading preparation programmes.
I am of the sentiment that if administrations invest on their existing workers, they would reap the benefits in so many ways. When employers make certain that their workers are to the full equipped for their occupations, it would non merely better productiveness but besides accelerate an administration ‘s return on investing. for illustration, IBM’sGlobal Human Capital Study 2005 carried out studies on over organisations worldwide and discovered that ” companies that support their employees to give more clip to larning are able to show higher net incomes per FTE… Not merely can developing hold a positive impact upon profitableness, but some companies besides see it as a agency of maintaining costs in cheque ” . Thus an administration that cares adequate to put in their workers is half manner to winning the conflict for endowment.
Today companies who want to accomplish competitory advantage are puting to a great extent on preparation and leading development because these companies know that success is tied to effectual leading and direction. Administrations should hence non undertake leading preparation and development as a manner of carry throughing all righteousness ( i.e. every one is making it we must make it every bit good ) instead they should ship on this preparation programmes to guarantee continuity of leading. That is non to state choosing those who they identify as the right leaders should be ignore. Both choice and preparation should work manus in manus for an administration who wants to better public presentation, return on investing and derive competitory advantage. Administrations besides need to place the different leading accomplishments required for different state of affairss. In a crisis state of affairs for illustration, persons who convey a sense of ego assurance, self subject, and calm would be effectual. For an administration that is fighting to foster its concern in the thick of austere competition, a leader with a vision, deep strategic thought accomplishments, and equal cognition of industry is what is needed.
The construct of leading has grown to go a broad spread phenomenon both within an administration and outside of it. Both private and public sectors have become truly involved in leading activities. Administrations are get downing to re-evaluate their perceptual experiences of leading. They have moved off from seeing leading as heroic to a corporate construct “ leading procedure ” where leading is a shared duty which requires the part of everyone.
However, the hereafter of corporate leading is non certain unless administrations begin to turn out their worth. whether leaders are born or made, administrations have come to gain that effectual choice and preparation are cardinal ingredients to hike public presentation. They should intermix enlisting and choice every bit good as effectual preparation if they want to develop effectual leaders. Administrations need to be precise who they send for assorted direction and leading classs. Some of the preparation may pay off on the long tally ; others are merely likely traveling to be a waste of clip and money. They do non hold to pass more, what they need to larn how to make is pass accurately. In add-on, if leading classs are shaped to hold an impact on what an administration wants to accomplish, they are worthwhile, pen and long addresss classs are merely traveling to be a waste of clip.
It is indispensable to observe that advancing leading without mention to direction is useless as leaders need core direction accomplishments such as long scope planning accomplishments, strong integrating and coordination.
I conclude my essay by stating that the twenty-four hours a leader stops larning ; he ceases to be an effectual leader. Leadership does exists and it works
Bass, B. , & A ; Riggio, R. , ( 2006 ) . Transformational Leadership. 2nd erectile dysfunction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennis, W. , & A ; Nanus, B. , ( 1985 ) . Leaderships: the schemes for taking charge. New York: Harper and Row.
Gardner, J. , ( 1989 ) . On Leadership. New York: Free Press.
Fiedler, F. , ( 1967 ) . A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill.
Gallic, R. et al. , ( 2008 ) . Organizational Behaviour. Chichester: John Wiley & A ; Sons Ltd.
Maxwell, J. , ( 1993 ) . Developing the Leader Within You. Nashville TN: Thomas Nelson Inc.
Northouse, P. , ( 1997 ) . Leadership: Theory and Practice. California: Sage.
Robbins, S. , ( 2003 ) . Organizational Behaviour. 10th erectile dysfunction. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Roach, C. , & A ; Bahling, O. , ( 1984 ) . “ Functionalism: Footing for an alternate attack to the survey of Leadership ”
Shackleton, V. , ( 1995 ) . Business Leadership. London: Routledge.
Stogdill, R. , ( 1974 ) . Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Literature. New York: Free Press.
Storey, J. , ( erectile dysfunction ) ( 2004 ) . Leadership in Organizations: Current issues and cardinal tendencies. London: Routledge.
Tichy, N. , ( 1997 ) . The Leadership Engine: How winning Companies Build Leaderships at every degree. New York: HaperCollins Publishers Inc.
Torrington, D. , Hall, L. & A ; Taylor, S. , ( 2005 ) . Human Resource Management. 6th erectile dysfunction. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Zaleznik, A. , ( 1964 ) . Directors and Leaderships: Are They Different? In H. , Levinson, erectile dysfunction. Designing and Managing Your Career. Boston: Havard Business School Press. pp.64-77.
Barker, R. , ( 1997 ) . How Can We Train Leaderships If We Do non cognize What Leadership Is? Human Relations, 50 ( 4 ) , pp.343-362.
Bennis, W. , ( 1959 ) . Leadership Theory and Administrative Behavior: The job of Authority. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, pp. 259-300
Bhatia, K. , ( 1995 ) . Leadership and Leaders on their manner. What do we necessitate to appreciate? The Journal of Leadership Studies, 2 ( 2 ) , pp. 65-72.
Bolden, R. , ( 2004 ) . What is Leadership? Research study. Centre for Leadership surveies. University of Exeter.
Burgardt, C. , ( 1996 ) . The Making of Leaders: A Review of the Research in Leadership Development and Education. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 3 ( 3 ) , pp. 81-95.
Competency & A ; Emotional Intelligence Quarterly ( 2003 ) . The Journal of Performance through People. 10 ( 3 ) , pp. 34-38.
Day, D. , & A ; Lord, R. , ( 1988 ) . Executive Leadership and organizational public presentation: Suggestions for a New Theory and Methodology. Journal of Management, 14 ( 3 ) , pp. 453-464.
Eccles, R. , ( 1991 ) . The public presentation measuring pronunciamento. Havard Business Review, Jan-Feb, pp. 131-137.
Higgs, M. , ( 2003 ) . How can we do sense of leading in the twenty-first century? Leadership and Organisational Development Journal, 24 ( 5 ) , pp. 273-284.
Horgan, R. , & A ; Hogan, J. , ( 2001 ) . Measuring leading: A position from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Development, 19 ( 1 ) , pp. 40-51.
James, D. , ( 1995 ) . Follow the Leader: Some ideas on Leadership. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 2 ( 1 ) , pp.162-164.
Kilpatrick, S. , & A ; Locke, E. , ( 1991 ) . Leadership: Make traits truly count? Academy of Management Executive, 5 ( 2 ) , pp. 48-60.
Levin, I. , & A ; Turner, R. , ( 2009 ) . Can Leaders truly be ‘Developed ” . The California Psychologist, 42 ( 1 ) .
Phillips, J. , ( 1995 ) . Leadership since 1975: Promotion or Inertia? The Journal of Leadership Studies, 2 ( 1 ) , pp.58-80.
Posner, B. , & A ; Kouzes, J. , ( 1996 ) . Ten lessons for Leaders and Leadership developers. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 3 ( 3 ) , pp. 2-10
Stogdill, R. , ( 1948 ) . Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. Journal of Psychology, 25 ( 64 ) , pp. 35-71.
Zaccaro, S. , & A ; Horn, Z. , ( 2003 ) . Leadership theory and pattern: Fostering an effectual mutualism. The Leadership Quarterly, 14 ( 6 ) , pp.769-806.
CIPD, ( July 2008 ) . Leadership: an overview, [ Online ] . Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/maneco/leadership/leadshipovw.htm. [ Accessed 5th January 2010 ] .
CIPD, ( September 2008 ) . Prosecuting Leadership: Creating Administrations that maximise the potency of their people [ on-line ] . Available at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cipd.co.uk/shapingthefuture/_leadershipreport.htm? IsSrchRes=1 [ Accesses 24th December 2009 ] .
Goleman, D. , ( 2000 ) . Leadership that gets consequences. Harvard Business Review, [ online ] . March- April, pp. 78-90. Available at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.anderson-sabourin.com/Leadership_That_Gets_Results.pdf [ Accessed 21st December 2009 ]
Goleman, D. , ( 1998 ) . What makes a leader? Havard Business Review, [ online ] . Nov-Dec, pp.1-11 Available at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //urgenceleadership.lesaffaires.com/attachments/743_what-makes-leader_Goleman.pdf [ Accessed 15th December 2009 ] .
Kumar, R. , ( n.d ) . Leadership- Endowment by Birth or Skills. [ on-line ] . Available at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gaebler.com/Leadership-Talent-Birth-or-Skill.htm [ Accessed 20th December 2009 ] .
Lica, M. , ( n.d ) . Directors and Leaderships Are they synonyms? [ online ] . Avaliable at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.scribd.com/doc/6311830/Managers-and-Leaders-Are-They-Synonyms [ Accessed 20th December 2009 ]
Reade, Q. , & A ; Thomas, D. , ( 2004 ) . Critics question the value of leading preparation, [ online ] . Available at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.personneltoday.com/articles/2004/10/12/26034/critics-question-value-of-leadership-training.html [ Accessed 9th January 2010 ] .
Wining the Battle for Talent, ( n.d ) . Available at:
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.www-304.ibm.com/jct03001c/services/learning/ites.wss/zz/en? pageType=page & A ; c=a0013800 [ Accessed 20th December 2009 ] .