The narrator’s reliability on the man who wanted to be a king

Kipling was a known journalist, who wrote this short story to show the power which journalists had over the government of India. Much of his narration relies heavily on the issues of his society and real life. He borrows on science and the urban world, family and social virtual, and the need for moral authority as represented by British Empire’s law. He tries to show the outcome of a government which is organized in powers which are civilized, and the horns that would come up as a result of that government .He tries to show moral issues and the punishments associated to crime in the society (Webster 149)

            Kiplan however does not maintain a consisted moral perspective in the story. For instance, he portrays Dan’s bravery and the Peachey’s martyrdom as sympathetic, and ranguish and daring aspects of their personality’s .This brings the moral issue of their way of behavior before as kings. He tries to criticize their exploitation, greed, desperation and murder, in this story. The terrible death should have been taken as their punishment, and which was just, but instead, he uses it to vindicate their characters. Kipling therefore brings about the symbolism that there was need to replace the anarch which was native, with the British order. The railways in India for example seem to be established well, as addressed by Rudyard. The trains demographics resembled the class lines in the society. The high class being the first and of high dollar aristocrats, the second was the folk middle class, and the intermediate who had to buy their own food , and who happened to die before their ride was over. The segregations shown here was another visible sign of the ideas belonging to imperialists and ethnocentric (39-40) “The train had begun to move out .the red man rubbed his eyes .he has gone to the South for a week, …now that’s like his impudence.De he says I was to give you anything”….I watched as the red lights in the dark. It was horribly cold…I climbed on ….I watched as the red lights die in the dark. It was horribly cold…I climbed on my own train –not an immediate carriage this time on and went to sleep” (Kipling 39)

            The story appears to be exiting and witty, which is obvious by “raw prose” and the yearn for exotic adventure, which were the characteristics of Kipling. It is remarkable as a summary imperialism motives and causes of action here are used to reveal human nature, which are a typical of the imperialists. Kipling also relies on the track of “animating animal”, and also the inanimate things by personifying them. The use of “the ship that found herself” the phrase, shows the structural part of steamship. Rudyard relies heavily on his wit, and deals with the ability of man to rule. From the way he perceives Dravot as a god, leads to the characters success as well as failure in his way of ruling iplang therefore uses Dravot as god to show us that though an earthly king can also rule as god, he can only become a king first by becoming a human being.Dravot succeeds in being reviewed as a godly king by ordering that the people should worship him, because he had great power. Similar actions are also being used in our society still. (Kipling 92)…nobody cares a straw for  the internal administration of native states, so long as oppression and crime are kept within decent limits, and the ruler is not drugged, drunk or diseased from one end of the year or the other…….dark places off the earth , full of unimaginable cruity……sometimes I lay out upon the ground and devoured. What I could get, from a plate made of leaves, and drunk the running water, and slept under the same rug as my servant…” (Kipling 93)

            The narrator also relies on the hybridity and his past history. The story relied heavily on his childhood experiences in India, and which showed the imperial ideology in the work. He can be said to have had a comprehensive tolerance in religion. That is how he managed to capture many features of the 19th century on page fire. “The redcoats, the pipe clayed belts, the pill box hats, the beer, the fights, the floggings, the hangings, the bugal-calls, the smell of oats and horse piss.” Kipling manages to create what can be termed as a “mirror-storm” which brings about contradictory responses to any reader, and especially an Indian. Page 44 reveals that Diarot was killed when he told the hidden story of his bleeding and mortality. He was killed by the tribe he belonged to, though he used to command. Kiplang here shows us that a structural crisis must always arise as result of cultural encounters (Webster 597)

Kipling wanted to remind us that, neither utopianism nor despair is ever a realistic attitude for any individual who thinks of anything military on the hand. The story could be said to revolve around a previously asked question: “What about Afghanistan?” however, his story remained entertaining according to the traditions of Gunga Din. The narrator meets  scruffy adventures which are believed to be two “common” ex-soldiers Daniel Dravot and Peachy Camelan, who are heading to Kafiristan to proclaim themselves as the kings. The narrator appears to help them when they turned for help as a result of being an outrider

 of imperialism. He therefore felt the need for freedom and democracy for the members in India where he also grew up (Bezant 149)

Kipling was discourse in his wrting.His literature therefore succeeds in telling us the progress, savagery, the civilization, democracy, science and religion, which enlightens the people about the dark customs of the native people. He relies on metaphors like deserts, garden, and references of David and goliath painting. He can be said to have written with a stem inside him really, and shows that we are practically at the centre of a gigantic joke. He was distinctive and deep and this made the story wonderful. The tale seems to contain some truth which Kipling should have heard before or had gotten such a narration before, most of his cultural hybridity is portrayed to have come from his religion as a Hindu, and having Hindu, Muslim and even Jewish friends who were fellow friends in free masons church. He is said to have been moving and walking at night in India with these friends and that is what inspired him in his narration. The story therefore becomes hard to ignore (websters 769)

At one level, Kiplings appears to be the “self-fashioning” despite the fact that these two characters appear as a king and viceroy, and the story appears to contain some imperial codes through a “parenthetic intervention” and the story is made to be of actors not characters ideally (Webster 769)

Kipling can be said to have a narrator who relies indifferent concepts in the story. The narrator borrowed a lot from the real world in order to make the story concrete and powerful. He features a lot on science and the urban world, religion, government and law, and also class traditions and the law. The hybridity of the narrations come as a result of the fact that he was born and brought up in India and clearly understood the laws of the land, the narrators attribute on religion and so inspired the writer a loy and helped in building the plot of narration. The imperialism system was another driving force which was relied on greatly by the narrators, for having been common in India by then. It is therefore a rich short story, which explores on the adventures of the human world, and also the wishes of men greatly .History and hybridity can be said to have been the key factors

Works cited

Besant, Annie.Thessophist magazine Sept- Dee 1934, Kessinger publishing,

2003. ISBN 076615209X

Kipling, Rudyard. The man who would be king and other short stories,

            Wordsworth, 1994.ISBN 1853262099

Webster, Merriam.Encyclopaedia of literature. Merriam Webster, 1995, ISBN

 087790426