A literature reappraisal of research on public direction webs shows that public direction bookmans are, first of all, interested in the procedures taking to development and direction of public direction webs ( PMNs ) . They are besides interested in the structural facets of public direction webs and their consequence on the public presentation and effectivity of those webs. How do webs germinate? What are the ancestors of public direction webs? What are the different structural constellations of public direction webs?

In this chapter, I cover and explore the theoretical models that can be used to explicate the structural development of public direction webs over clip. First, I provide a reappraisal of theories that explain the outgrowth and development of public direction webs, such as resource dependence theory, population ecology, dealing cost economic sciences, and organisational alteration theories. Second, I provide a description of the indispensable constructs of societal web analysis that allow one to look at a web both as a system ( and subsystems ) and as relationships at the nested degree. I review the constructs of societal web analysis utilizing the different degrees of analysis that are conventionally accepted in the community of societal web analysts: single histrion degree, tie degree ( dyad and triad degrees ) , subgroup, and whole web or planetary degree ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) .

2.1 Procedure of web formation and development

Public direction networks emerge as a response to “ wicked policy ” jobs and sometimes as the legal and compulsory demand for turn toing complex issues. No individual theory can outdo explicate the formation and development of public direction webs. However, a broader position of organisational theory literature suggests several possible accounts for web formation and farther development: resource dependence theory, population ecology, dealing cost economic sciences and that popular set of organisational alteration theories including life-cycle, teleological and dialectical theories.

Resource Dependency Theory

Resource dependence theory suggests that organisations secure the stable flow of resources to last in different environments. Interorganizational cooperation can be explained in footings of the critical resources necessary for the effectual operation and endurance of the take parting organisations. Harmonizing to resource dependence theory, every organisation is dependent on those organisations or bureaus that control resources that are critical for the being and effectual operations of that organisation ( Pfeffer & A ; Salancik, 2003 ) . Therefore, organisations form in webs to procure critical resources to put to death their operations. It is worthwhile observing that these resources can non merely be material but besides symbolic, particularly if they are related to repute, trust, prestigiousness and legitimacy ( Hardy & A ; Phillips, 1998 ) .

Pfeffer and Salancik ( 2003 ) separate two mechanisms for structuring organisational resources: web extension and web consolidation. Through web extensions, organisations can increase the figure of connexions with different resource suppliers and therefore set up web connexions. Through web consolidation, organisations decrease the figure of resource suppliers by making alliances with other resources suppliers.

From a societal web analysis position, resource dependence is necessary for any organisation that wants to pull off its ties with stakeholders so that the entire portfolio of its ties is optimum for accomplishing organisational ends. Mere interconnection, without strong web ties, is no longer sufficient for organisational endurance in the long tally ( Uzzi, 1996 ) . Furthermore, organisations can derive a fiscal advantage by organizing synergistic confederations that change the form of dependences in their respected environment ( Larson, 1992 ) .

Population ecology

Population ecology seeks to explicate the birth and decease of organisations every bit good as the factors impacting phases of organisational life. Specifically it attempts to explicate factors impacting the rate of organisational birth and decease in the population of organisations viing for the same resources. The theory of population ecology is the societal extension of Neo-Darwinism and familial schools and is based on the biological rules of fluctuation, choice and keeping where familial fluctuations lead to procedures of mutant and natural choice of the fittest ( Hatch, 1997 )

Baum ( 1996 ) neatly summarized three cardinal procedures in the survey of population ecology research: demographical procedures, ecological procedures and environmental procedures. Demographical procedures research looks at age and size dependences, proposing that younger and smaller organisations are more prone to demise and organisational decease unless functions and modus operandis within organisations are established and linkages with stakeholders are strengthened ( Freeman, Carroll, & A ; Hannan, 1983 ) . Ecological procedures are related to niche-width kineticss, population kineticss, denseness dependance and community mutuality, including mutualism and competition. Environmental procedures include: institutional procedures ( political turbulence, for illustration ) , authorities ordinances, technological procedures and institutional alterations. Technological procedures, for illustration, affect the development of new organisations and find survival rates. Therefore, the political, economic, societal, proficient, and legal features of the environment affect organisational birth and decease, since organisations are non ever capable of get bying with lifting environmental complexness.

The cardinal thoughts of population ecology such as legitimacy, competition and niche are indispensable for explicating web formation and the effectual direction of public direction webs. The legitimacy of an organisation can be promoted by its web connexions in the market ( Hannan & A ; Freeman, 1977 ; Podolny, 1993 ) . Similarly, the thought of competition in population ecology is compatible with the construct of structural equality in the web. When organisations portion “ common ” signifiers it means they are structurally tantamount ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003 ) . In add-on, the place of the market in relation to a web is really similar to the thought of the niche in population ecology ( Burt, 1992 ) .

The theory of population ecology remainders on three evolutionary rules: fluctuation, choice and keeping. Variation of organisational signifiers can be of two types: “ blind ” and “ knowing ” ( Aldrich, 1999 ) . Blind fluctuations create new organisational signifiers by opportunity and are similar to biological mutants. Intentional fluctuations occur during the procedure of job resolution and developing new merchandises and services as the consequence of entrepreneurship. Selection operates on fluctuations and is carried out through “ the operation of market forces, competitory force per unit areas, the logic of internal structuring, conformance to commit norms and other forces ” ( Aldrich, 1999, p. 26 ) . As competition intensifies, organisations become engaged in the procedures of symbiosis and mutualism by developing webs of dealingss among each other. Therefore, organisations form internal web constructions that replace external dependences but increase their internal complexnesss. Retention occurs when a fluctuation selected by the environment becomes portion and package of a organisation, a mundane modus operandi, advanced pattern or competitory advantage. Two types of inventions are distinguished here, incremental and extremist ( Tushman & A ; Romanelli, 1985 ) . Most of the organisational inventions tend to be incremental and aimed at bettering organisations, whereas extremist inventions transform the whole of nature of operations in the organisations.

Organizational alteration theories

Most of the procedure theories in organisational surveies were described by new wave de Ven and Poole ( 1995 ) in their seminal article sum uping all types of procedure theories and theories of an organisation ‘s development. They define development as “ a alteration procedure ( i.e. , a patterned advance of alteration events that unfold during the continuance of an entity ‘s existence-from the induction or oncoming of the entity to its terminal or expiration ) ” ( Van de Ven & A ; Poole, 1995, p. 512 ) . These writers distinguish four types of procedure theories: life rhythm ( additive sequential ) , teleological ( insistent handbill ) , dialectical ( based on the principal of Hegelian doctrine ) and evolutionary ( based on the thoughts of Darwinism ) . Figure 1 shows a sum-up of each theory. Since population ecology is an evolutionary theory and was discussed in the old subdivision, I will concentrate on the life rhythm, teleological and dialectical theories.

Life rhythm theory equates an organisation to a biological being, in that “ the development entity has within it an implicit in signifier, logic, plan, or codification that regulates the procedure of alteration and moves the entity from a given point of going toward a subsequent terminal that is prefigured in the present province ” ( Van de Ven & A ; Poole, 1995, p. 515 ) . This theory describes inevitable additive sequences of at least three phases: outgrowth, development and expiration. Some interorganizational bookmans province that in the development phase of collaborative webs, histrions are engaged in larning about successes and failures of coaction during the procedure of execution. This learning procedure may ensue in altering the original programs and operations or even web expiration ( Kanter, 1994 ; Larson, 1992 ; Lowndes & A ; Skelcher, 1998 ) .

Figure: Procedure Theories of Organizational Development and Change

Degree centigrades: UsersavkolpakDesktopmediaimage1.png

Beginning: Van de Ven, A. , & A ; Poole, M. S. ( 1995 ) . Explaining development and alteration in organisations. The Academy of Management Review, 20 ( 3 ) , 510-540

The public direction literature on collaborative administration and public direction webs does non supply many illustrations of life rhythm theory. Having examined the administration of organisational webs and the impact of administration on web effectivity, Provan and Kenis ( 2008 ) suggested a life rhythm development of public direction webs where the webs are “ likely to germinate in a predictable form from the shared administration to a more brokered signifier and participant governed to externally ( NAO ) governed ( P. 246 ) . ”

Teleological theory assumes that organisations are purposeful and adaptative and that, either entirely or by interacting with other organisations, they should make a peculiar jutting province of being by taking appropriate actions and supervising the advancement ( Van de Ven & A ; Poole, 1995 ) . Harmonizing to teleological theory, the development of organisational signifiers comes about through a insistent sequence of end preparation, execution and alterations as needed. This theory does non enforce any prescribed sequence of phases, but there is one demand, which is making the concluding end or terminal province. The theory assumes a extremely rational behaviour on behalf of the histrion, a purposefully driven behaviour to accomplish ends that are socially constructed and capable to alter. Teleological theory besides recognizes the confining function of organisational environments and the importance of environmental scanning for taking full advantage of environmental factors.

Goal oriented and cyclical attacks to the development of interorganizational webs assume that interorganizational partnerships and webs are developed through sequences of dialogue and committedness every bit good as through the development of regulations for how to join forces and run within the web ( Doz, 1996 ; Ring & A ; van de Ven, 1992, 1994 ) . Ringing and van de Ven ( 1994 ) propose the theoretical account of web development as a reiterative rhythm of dialogues, committedness and executing. Each phase consists of a series of interactions, the results of which are assessed in footings of efficiency and equity. Doz ( 1996 ) suggests that the development of strategic confederations goes through a sequence of learning-reevaluation-readjustment rhythms, which can hold a positive and cumulative impact on committedness to the relationship. The importance of larning throughout the whole sequence of reduplications is besides emphasized by Weiss and Visioni ( 2003 ) .

Dialectical theory assumes that organisations are positioned in a universe of opposing forces, values and events viing with each other. Stability and alter depend on the balance of power between clashing forces, events and values. Harmonizing to dialectical theory, organisational development or alteration takes topographic point when the position quo is challenged by more powerful opposing forces, events and values. The procedure of development in the dialectical attack is explained in Hegelian footings of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. Every new province or phase of organisational development would be best described as a synthesis that has emerged as a consequence of the battle of thesis and antithesis embodied by opposing forces, events and values. In public disposal literature, this attack was introduced by Nutt and Backoff ( 1992 ) at the scheme degree as one of the attacks to develop schemes in the populace and non-profit-making sectors.

The dialectical attack to web development has been explored by Benson ( 1975 ) , who describes an interorganizational web as “ political economic system concerned with the distribution of two scarce resources, money and authorization ” ( p. 229 ) . Benson argues that the flow of resources is contingent on developments in the external environment, including governments, legislative organic structures, agency, and the general populace. Very late, the dialectical attack to the development of administration webs in the populace sector was applied by Saz-Carranza and Longo ( 2012 ) to explicate the development of the European regulative web. They conclude that dialectical theory is utile for explicating the tensenesss between hierarchy as a coordination mechanism and informal and decentralised webs, tensenesss that trigger further development of administration webs.

Transaction Cost Economicss

The dealing cost economic attack uses the survey of economic sciences to supply an account for web formation and development. This attack was developed in resistance to traditional economic theory, which promotes the thought of the market as the classical organisational signifier where purchasers and Sellerss openly exchange information and their purposes and where the monetary value is determined by supply and demand. While the traditional theory of economic sciences focal points chiefly on production costs, dealing cost economic sciences focuses on the costs related to seeking for information and negociating about the monetary value and quality of goods and services that serve as inputs in the production procedure of organisations ( Williamson, 1975, 1985 ) . Conversely, representatives of neoclassical economic sciences praise “ organisational hierarchies and perpendicular integrating, which are a more efficient alternate to the markets ” ( Jablin & A ; Putnam, 2001, p. 454 ) . Therefore, directors of organisations face the “ brand or purchase ” quandary. Organizations can either purchase goods and services from other houses or purchase houses that produce those goods and services. Williamson ( 1985 ) argues that efficient organisations should minimise dealing costs by taking between markets and hierarchies. Networks emerge as an alternate to markets and organisational hierarchies and serve as a intercrossed organisational signifier that incorporates the best characteristics of markets and organisational hierarchies ( Powell, 1990 ) .

However, the determination between minimising the transactional costs of happening good monetary values and quality from resource suppliers and the administrative costs of keeping hierarchy can act upon the formation of peculiar types of webs. If an organisation decides to trust on the market signifier of bring forthing goods and services, so this organisation has to develop and keep comprehensive external webs for obtaining and measuring information about the resource providers, negociating contracts and monitoring public presentation. If an organisation decides to follow a hierarchal signifier, the organisation has to develop and keep comprehensive internal webs for incorporating purchased houses that provide parts, natural resources and constituents for the production of goods and services ( Monge & A ; Contractor, 2003 )

The original thoughts of the dealing cost economic sciences attack were critiqued by Zajac and Olsen ( 1993 ) for disregarding communicating and other procedures happening in the dealing cost analysis. Zajac and Olsen ( 1993 ) proposed a three-stage procedure where two or more organisations can make up one’s mind if they want to prosecute an organisational partnership. During the first phase, called “ initializing, ” organisations develop their strategic programs, measure their exchange options and get down interorganizational exchange. Particularly, they are involved in the “ procedure of projecting exchange into the hereafter ( Macneil, 1983 ) and building net present ratings of alternate exchange relationships on a continuum runing from markets, through interorganizational schemes, to hierarchies ” ( Zajac & A ; Olsen, 1993, p. 139 ) . The first unit of ammunitions of exchange are included in this phase every bit good and “ take the signifier of preliminary communicating and dialogue refering common and single house involvements, and/or feasibleness surveies and general information exchange ” ( p.139 ) . During the 2nd phase, called the “ processing ” phase, organisations are involved in the consecutive and parallel procedures of exchange. A consecutive procedure of exchange involves “ a series of distinct minutess through a individual channel of exchange extending over the class of the prognosis period, ” whereas a parallel procedure is one in which “ the exchange occurs at the same time over several channels of mutualist exchange over the class of the prognosis period ” ( p. 140 ) . As in the first phase, larning takes topographic points in this phase, giving rise to “ associations, cognitive systems, and memories ” ( Fiol & A ; Lyles, 1985, p. 804 ) . Trust besides develops in the processing phase based on the outlooks of stable interactions with another organisation over a long period of clip. Finally, the 3rd phase, called “ reconfiguration, ” is characterized by the rating of the interorganizational relationship and a determination about whether to do any alterations in the relationship, either by go outing the partnership or by prosecuting in even more parallel interorganizational exchanges. If the latter, information and communicating web dealingss would be strengthened, and more stable organisational signifiers may emerge, such as joint venture.

In amount, the theories presented here, explicating the development of public direction webs, are keys for ordering effectual web direction mechanisms. However, each of these theories presents a disconnected position of the whole procedure of web formation and virtually ignores the structural facets of web development. For case, none reference the peculiar structural features of a web such as denseness, centrality, reciprocality, transitivity, structural holes or figure of coteries. The following subdivision is devoted to explicating the most widely used structural features of webs found in the organisational theory literature of both public and general direction Fieldss.

2.2 Social structuring of public direction webs

A great trade of bing public direction web research is concerned with look intoing the societal constructions that emerge as a consequence of the interactions between public, non-profit-making and private organisations. Social constructions are defined as “ forms of connectivity and cleavage within societal systems ” ( Wellman, 1988, p. 26 ) . Analyzing societal constructions allows one to compare emerging public direction webs and to observe the differences between the ascertained webs and constructions developed theoretically ( Barley, 1990 ) . The analysis of the societal constructions in public direction webs can look at a web both as a system and subsystems every bit good as relationships at the nested degree. This sort of analysis can “ follow sidelong and perpendicular flows of information, place beginnings and marks, and detect structural restraints runing on flows of resources ” ( Wellman, 1988, p. 26 ) . Using societal construction analysis ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) , one can see the different types of relationship among the web histrions, the strength of relationships, power and authorization distribution and handiness of resources.

Public direction and policy webs are characterized by “ high degrees of mutuality affecting multiple organisations, where formal lines of authorization are blurred and where diverse policy histrions are knitted together to concentrate on common jobs ” ( Schneider, Scholz, Lubell, Mindruta, & A ; Edwardsen, 2003, pp. 143-144 ) . These mutualities, hence, can be studied through a figure of societal analysis constructs: reciprocality, denseness, bridging and bonding. As mentioned antecedently, organisational webs can be studied at different degrees: single histrion degree, tie degree ( dyad and triad degrees ) , subgroup, and whole web or planetary degree ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . In public direction web research, the single histrion degree is traditionally represented by organisations from assorted sectors whether public, private or non-profit-making as units of observation. However, the single histrion degree can besides be represented by groups and persons within the organisations representing the interorganizational webs. Tie degree is represented by couple and three degrees of web. At the couple degree, organisational web research workers examine the relationship between two web histrions, whether this relationship is reciprocated or non. At the triadic degree, three nodes and relationships among histrions are examined, particularly in footings of balance and web transitivity. Research workers may look into the different types of threes that describe the disposition of a web for hierarchy, flow of resources and distribution of power in the web.

At the subgroup degree, an organisational research worker investigates the rank in the different subgroups and the features of the members belonging to these subgroups ( Monge & A ; Contractor, 2003 ) Finally, planetary or whole-network-level research looks at the belongingss of the whole web such as web centralisation, web denseness, web reachability and web balance. Each of these belongingss can indicate to the features that are indispensable for understanding the effectivity of a public direction web. For illustration, extremely centralized informal dealingss in a public direction web may bespeak the mechanistic nature of the organisations representing this web. Similarly, an interorganizational web with multiple centres in the web of informal dealingss indicates the organic nature of forming in this web ( Shrader, Lincoln, & A ; Hoffman, 1989 ) .

Individual histrion degree constructs

Individual histrion degree constructs include grade, indegree and outdegree centrality, eigenvector centrality, betweenness centrality, intimacy centrality, structural holes and homophily. Each of these represents the of import structural features of a web that can be modeled and linked to peculiar societal, organisational and public direction theories.

Degree, indegree and outdegree centrality is measured by the Numberss of ties held by one peculiar node ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . In a directed web, the figure of ties coming out of a node or a web histrion is defined as outdegree centrality. Similarly, the figure of ties coming to a node or a web histrion is called indegree centrality. In adrift webs, the figure of ties held by a peculiar node or web histrion is called degree centrality.

The degree centrality of a node can be interpreted otherwise in assorted contexts and have both positive and negative significances, contingent on the context ( Monge & A ; Contractor, 2003 ) . In a communicating web, a high outdegree centrality points at the “ expansiveness ” of a peculiar node, whereas a high indegree centrality serves as a placeholder of peculiar histrion. One popular usage of degree centrality is the step of societal capital at the single degree. Emergency direction bookmans view degree centrality as the grade of reactivity of an organisation to natural catastrophes ( Kapucu, Augustin, & A ; Garayev, 2009 ) . Monge and Contractor ( 2004 ) argue that high grade centrality can besides be interpreted as “ communicating overload or a restraint on the node ‘s ability to work efficaciously ” ( p. 38 ) .

Eigenvector centrality is based on degree centrality and is calculated by summing all ties of one web histrion to other histrions, weighted by their grade of centrality ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . The web histrion is considered to be cardinal if he or she has more direct or indirect connexions to the most popular histrions in the web. Since eigenvector centrality is based on degree centrality, it can bring forth the same consequences as degree centrality. Eigenvector centrality serves as a step of the popularity of a web histrion.

Betweenness centrality measures the grade to which a web histrion is straight connected to those nodes in the web that happen non to be connected straight to each other ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . It besides measures the grade to which one peculiar node serves as a bridging point among different web histrions. The reading of betweenness centrality is once more contingent on the context. In communicating webs, the high betweenness centrality of a peculiar web histrion defines the gatekeeper place that controls or agents the information flow or even imposes peculiar significances on informations. In interorganizational webs, betweenness centrality indicates the place of liason between persons, groups and organisations that are non connected straight. If such a liason individual, group or organisation is eliminated from the web, it may take to disjunction of subnetworks that are non connected straight. As in the instance of degree centrality, betweenness centrality is used as a structural feature to specify the public presentation of exigency direction webs. Kapucu ( 2009 ) found that low tonss in betweenness centrality indicate a low communicating dependence of web histrions on other organisations.

Closeness centrality measures “ the extent to which nodes are straight or indirectly connected to all other nodes in the web ” ( Monge & A ; Contractor, 2003, p. 38 ) , and can be considered a planetary web step since all web ties are taken into history to cipher it. If degree centrality measures the activity performed by a peculiar node, if betweenness centrality measures the control over the flow of information, so intimacy centrality shows the independency of a peculiar web histrion from other web histrions ( Prell, 2012 ) . The independent histrion has the shortest way lengths to other web histrions, so this histrion has no demand to “ trust on others to relay messages through the web ” ( Prell, 2012, p. 107 ) . Therefore, high intimacy centrality can function as a placeholder for the reachability of a peculiar web histrion. In other words, intimacy centrality allows for the appraisal of the indirect range of a web histrion.

Social web research workers have developed different readings for intimacy centrality. Some research workers view closeness centrality as the possible to mobilise the whole web when needed ( Prell, 2012 ) . Some research workers believe that intimacy centrality shows how easy a peculiar web histrion can entree information in the web ( Leavitt, 1951 ) . Finally, some research workers believe that closeness centrality can be a placeholder for power ( Coleman, 1973 ) and influence ( Friedkin, 1991 ) . In the exigency direction literature, closeness centrality is used as the step of an organisation ‘s reactivity to natural catastrophes ( Kapucu, 2005 ) .

Structural holes allow web histrions to hold a structural advantage over other web histrions. The impression of structural holes was introduced by Ronald Burt, who defined structural holes as “ the empty infinites in the societal construction ” ( Burt, 2005, p. 16 ) . Structural holes are traditionally present in egoistic webs, which are based on the perceptual experiences and self-reported replies of the respondents. The respondents are called “ egos ” and reported connexions are called “ alters. ” The construct of structural holes in kernel defines the place of a agent who connects subnetworks and unconnected persons and who benefits from this place. The thought of structural holes is tightly connected with the construct of societal capital. After all, those who connect the unconnected portion of the web such as subnetworks, coteries and unconnected persons can take structural advantage by deriving entree to coveted information, untapped organisational resources, and calling chances and by organizing alliances for prosecuting one ‘s ends and involvements ( Brass, 1984 ; Burt, 1976, 1992, 2001, 2004, 2005 ; Granovetter, 1974 ; Granovetter & A ; Swedberg, 1992 ) .

Burt conducted a figure of surveies demoing the nexus between make fulling a structural hole and different organisational results such as higher net incomes, better wages and advanced thoughts ( Burt, 1976, 1992, 2001, 2004, 2005 ) . Other research workers have used Burt ‘s research docket to look into the consequence of structural holes on the advanced capacity of organisations ( Ahuja, 2000 ) , achieving position in organisations ( Lin, 1999 ) and the consequences of public presentation rating ( Mehra, Kilduff, & A ; Brass, 2001 ) .

Homophily is defined as “ the grade to which braces of persons who interact are similar in individuality or organisational group associations ” ( Ibarra, 1993, p. 61 ) . The outgrowth of homophily may depend on either the organisational scene or on societal individuality. Coleman ( 1961 ) and Feld ( 1981, 1982 ) argue that the formation of ties among similar web histrions is contingent on the organisational scene. For illustration, persons with high degrees of selflessness tend to fall in non-profit-making organisations since similarity in values will most likely influence other similarities among histrions. Other illustrations of organisations are churches, athleticss nines, bowling groups, etc. Skvoretz ( 1985, 1990 ) , nevertheless, argues that organisational scenes have nil to make with the formation of homophilic ties. Network histrions merely look for and happen other web histrions based on societal, cultural and demographic similarities irrespective of the organisational scene. For illustration, friendly relationship ties in an organisation may be formed based on age or educational background similarities.

Homophily helps to explicate the formation of gender webs within organisational and interorganizational scenes. Harmonizing to Ibarra ( 1993, 1997 ) , work forces are more likely to organize homophilous ties across multiple webs and have stronger homophilous ties. And these webs tend to be damaging for adult females and good to work forces because of their inclination to be homophilous. By comparing, Ibarra ( 1992 ) argues that adult females ‘s webs have a different form in footings of homophily, that adult females are inclined to organize differentiated webs in which they obtain “ societal support and friendly relationship from adult females and instrumental entree through web ties to work forces ” ( p. 422 ) . In add-on, work forces gain the more benefits from homophilous relationships along with single and positional resources compared to adult females.

From a public direction and public policy position, homophily can be utile to explicate the formation of public direction webs. Provan and Kenis ( 2008 ) argue that interorganizational coaction and the formation of public direction webs can be explained by the similarities of organisations and their representatives. However, it is still unknown whether it is the similarity of organisational ends or the instrumental grounds of persons that is most of import. Surprisingly, Newman and Dale ( 2007 ) recommend forestalling homophily in sustainable development webs. They argue that, given the fact that webs tend to gravitate toward and increase homophily over clip, and that homophily decreases the diverseness of web histrions in the sustainable development web, this in bend reduces the web resiliency and stableness.

Tie-level constructs

Tie degree constructs include the strength of a tie, reciprocality, multiplexity, triadic relationships and Simmelian ties. Each of these represents the of import structural features of a web that can be modeled and linked to peculiar societal, organisational and public direction theories.

The strength of a tie is a construct coined by Granovetter ( 1973 ) and is defined as a “ combination of the sum of clip, the emotional strength, the familiarity ( common confiding ) , and the reciprocal services which characterize the tie ” ( p. 1361 ) . Harmonizing to Granovetter ( 1973 ) ties can be either strong or weak. Strong ties are exemplified by long-time, frequent relationships such as close friendly relationship ties where friends interact with each other on a frequent footing. Weak ties, on the contrary, are characterized by rarity, fluidness and distance, but they besides happen to be more valuable in footings of obtaining diverse information and bridging the spreads between coteries in the web. Therefore, weak ties are more likely to supply calling chances for people in the web than are the strong ties of friendly relationship and affinity. Recent research, nevertheless, suggests that peculiar types of strong ties are necessary for conveying the complex cognition in the web ( Hansen, 1999 ) .

From a public direction and public policy position, weak ties function as Bridgess for disconnected subnetworks ( coteries, for illustration ) , which later unite and form theose subnetworks for work outing corporate action jobs ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003 ) . The figure of weak ties in public direction webs can besides function as a structural index of a peculiar phase of web development and web effectivity. Provan and Milward ( 2001 ) province that the early phases of web development are characterised by a multiplicity of weak ties, some of which tend to vanish as public direction webs evolve.

Reciprocality or mutualness is defined by the figure of symmetric ties among the web histrions. There are three types of directional ties that may be between any two persons: nothing, symmetric and asymmetric ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . Null dealingss are characterized by the absence of dealingss between two nodes in the web. Symmetric ties exist when two web histrions have ties to each other. Asymmetrical ties are characterized by a state of affairs where a tie exists merely between two web histrions. For illustration, one web histrion sends information to another histrion, but the other histrion does non direct any information back. Friendship dealingss normally tend to be symmetric, and even if they are asymmetric there is ever a force per unit area to transform them into the symmetric by interrupting other ties or restoring the lost connexion ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003 ) . Power and influence relationships are normally characterized by dissymmetry ( De Soto, 1960 ) .

Reciprocality, as a structural feature of a web, explains the grade of resource exchange in the web from a theoretical point of position. Social exchange theory, as developed by Homans ( 1950, 1974 ) and Blau ( 1964 ) , stipulates that human dealingss can be explained by the weighing up of resource exchanges such as information and resources. Therefore, edifice and keeping web ties is conditioned on reciprocality of interchanging resources ( Willer & A ; John, 1997 ) . For illustration, if web histrion A provides information to histrion B, he/she expects histrion B to reciprocate and supply information back. The research besides suggests that the exchange of resources is limited to one-to-one types of exchanges. For illustration, person who receives one type of resource such as information may reciprocate by supplying advice or support ( Rank, Robins, & A ; Pattison, 2010 ) .

Multiplexity of ties refers to the figure of different dealingss between two web histrions. For illustration, two web histrions can be friends and program web activities together, therefore being engaged in the multiplex relationship. Multiplexity of ties allows mensurating the “ multiplicity of involvements ” ( Barnes, 1979, p. 412 ) and delegating the value of ties based on the figure of involvements. The higher value of a tie indicates the greater trouble in interrupting that peculiar tie since people are “ bound to each other in the different societal spheres ” ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003, p. 33 ) .

Multiplexity of ties is another structural step which shows the development of public direction webs over clip every bit good as the development of trust. Having studied the development of one community mental wellness system, Provan, Isett, & A ; Milward ( 2004 ) came to the decision that the figure of ties and the strengths of the multiplexity of the ties increases over clip. In another survey, Isett and Provan ( 2005 ) found that although multiplexity and embeddedness of ties in a web of publically funded wellness and human services bureaus tends to increase over clip, there is non needfully a lessening in formal ties at the same clip. Multiplexity of ties can be besides interpreted as a step of trust in the web. If web histrions are bound by different manifold dealingss, they are predicted to hold more trust and committedness between them because of the strong embeddedness of their operations with each other ( Granovetter, 1985 ; Uzzi, 1997 ) . It is necessary to observe that the development of public direction webs is non accompanied by the transmutation of formal or contractual ties into informal ties, which allows for the edifice of trust among web histrions. Unlike in private sector webs, formal ties in public direction webs become strengthened over clip, alongside the development of informal ties such as referrals ( Isett & A ; Provan, 2005 ) .

The three is another structural feature in web analysis that depicts relationships between three web histrions, and which is about wholly underutilized in public direction research. A three is the entirety of links between three histrions ( or a three-base hit ) . Three web histrions representing a three without ties is called three-base hit ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . When we add ties to a couple, it becomes a three. If dyadic relationships include three types of relations-mutual, asymmetic and null-triad constellations emcompass up to sixteen types of threes, indispensable for proving assorted structural hypotheses about web development, structuring and public presentation. These 16 threes range from wholly “ void ” threes to wholly common threes. The three without any ties between three web histrions constituing a three is called a wholly void three. If all three web histrions constituing a three are connected by common ties, so this type of three is called a wholly common three. Each of these types of three is used in the triadic nose count analysis, which allows research workers to prove assorted structural hypotheses and links the structural belongingss of a web to peculiar web theories.

A triadic nose count analyzes the assorted triadic web constellations that influence the chance that ties will be present or absent in the web ( Contractor, Wasserman, & A ; Faust, 2006 ) . As Wasserman and Faust ( 1994 ) argue, there is well more that we can larn from a count of threes, known as a triadic nose count, because the analysis does non distill the original informations every bit much as a dyad nose count: a triadic nose count analysis has 16 constituents instead than the three constituents that can be found in a dyadic nose count.

Research workers analysing the 16 constituents, or isomorphous categories, in a triadic nose count usage a labeling strategy that highlights the dyadic provinces contained within the three. For illustration, on the one manus, a three could theoretically incorporate no linkages among the three histrions, such that there would be zero common ( connected in both waies ) couples in the three, zero asymmetric ( connected in one way ) dyads in the three, and three nothing ( no connexion ) dyads in the three. This three is labeled as a aˆ•003 triad category with the three characters meaning common, asymmetic, and void dyadic provinces. In the other extreme, a three could dwell of complete mutualness ( three common couples ) with no asymmetric or void couples. This triad category is labeled as a aˆ•300. Since there are a sum of 16 such categories, the labeling strategy can include labels such as aˆ•201 ( two common, zero asymmetric, and one nothing couple ) or aˆ•210 ( two common, one asymmetric, and zero void couples ) . Therefore, the triadic nose count is an expedient manner to cut down an full sociomatrix to a smaller set of 16 drumhead statistics with which to prove assorted structural hypotheses related to structural balance, resource exchange and transitivity.

Transitive and cyclical threes are of peculiar involvement for research workers look intoing the structural facets of interorganizational and interpersonal webs. Transitive threes occur when a web histrion A has a connexion or tie to a web histrion B, a web histrion B extends a tie to a web histrion C and web histrion A is in bend connected to a web histrion C. From a theoretical point of position, transitive threes can be interpreted otherwise depending on the substantial nature of the dealingss. Harmonizing to theories of cognitive balance ( Heider, 1958 ; Holland & A ; Leinhardt, 1975, 1981 ) , friends prefer that their friendly relationship ties be reciprocated so that their friends should be friends with each other. Therefore, if individual A is friends with individual B, individual B is friends with individual C, so there is a force per unit area for individual A to be friends with individual C. Related to this, people prefer taking friends based on a strong compatibility of beliefs, values and involvements. This value and belief compatibility in transitive threes has peculiar deductions for developing collaborative ties in the procedure of organizing public direction webs every bit good as for reenforcing trust as public direction webs evolve ( Henry, Lubell, & A ; McCoy, 2011 ) . Transitive threes in formal relationships within organisational and interorganizational webs point at the presence of hierarchy or perpendicular integrating where one can see a clear concatenation of bid. In other words, there is a foreman for every foreman and there is a clear line of subordination ( Contractor et al. , 2006 ) . In team-based organisations, the hierarchy is based on distinction and caused by specialisation, duty, and deputation of authorization for doing determinations.

Cyclic threes are threes with ties linking web histrions in a clockwise order. Network histrion A has a tie to web histrion B, web histrion B sends a tie to web histrion C and eventually web histrion C has a tie to web histrion A, therefore completing the rhythm ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . Similar to transitive threes, cyclical threes can be interpreted based on the nature of the relationship ( Contractor et al. , 2006 ) . When web participants are involved in interchanging resources, i.e. , supplying information, having information, or giving advice, so these sort of relationships can be explained by the theory of generalised exchange ( Bearman, 1997 )

Simmelian ties are dyadic relationships between two web histrions belonging to the same coterie. Krackhardt ( 1999 ) defines Simmelian ties as ties between two people who “ are in return and strongly tied to each other and. . . each in return and strongly tied to at least one 3rd party in common ” ( p. 186 ) . Initially, these ties were described by Georg Simmel, the German sociologist who discussed the differences between triadic relationships and dyadic relationships. Subsequently, Krackhardt ( 1999 ) described Simmelian ties as relationships between two web histrions embedded in the coterie, where the norms of the coterie find the behaviour in the couples. Bing embedded in the coterie, these dyadic relationships are restrained in footings of attitudes and behaviours because the triadic relationship in the coterie represses the involvements of each web histrion in the couple, weakening the single bases of power of each of the web histrions every bit good as chairing the struggle.

Simmelian ties have several of import deductions for public policy and public direction webs from the evolutionary position. First, Simmelian ties tend to be more stable over clip so non-Simmelian ties ( Krackhardt, 1998 ) since they tend to be “ stron and gluey. “ ( Krackhardt, 1998, p. 21 ) Second, web histrions tied by Simmelian ties tend to portion similar positions on organisational and societal world compared to the couple ties of persons non embedded in the coterie. From a public policy position, persons keeping Simmelian ties portion the same policy beliefs and are more likely to prosecute in collaborative relationships than persons outside of these ties and coteries ( Henry et al. , 2011 ) . Simmelian ties besides characterize the behaviour and relationships of web histrions belonging to different subnetworks such as policy subnetworks, pull offing subnetworks and financial subnetworks ( Rethemeyer & A ; Hatmaker, 2008 ) . It may be assumed that behaviour of web histrions will be contingent on the regulations and ordinances adopted in the several subnetworks of coteries representing a public direction web.

Subgroup degree constructs

Subgroup degree constructs include cohesive subgroups, coherence, and coteries. As I mentioned earlier, each of these represents an of import structural feature of a web that can be modeled and linked to specific societal, organisational and public direction theories.

A subgroup is defined as a web country taking an intermediate place between threes and the whole or the whole web. A cohesive subgroup is a type of subgroup where a big figure of web histrions have direct, strong, common, frequent ties or connexions within this peculiar subgroup ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . The impression of cohesive subgroups is of import for analyzing public policy and public direction webs, since cohesive societal constructions determine the attitudes and behaviour of the web histrions belonging to these cohesive groups.

Coherence is a group belongings demoing the attraction of group members to each other and their feelings of belonging and motive to remain together as a group ( Prell, 2012 ) . From the societal web position, coherence can be defined by the ties linking web histrions together as a group ( Moody & A ; White, 2003 ) . As a web construction, it has a profound impact on the behaviour, attitudes and values of the web histrions who are portion of cohesive subgroups ( Prell, 2012 ) . Coherence can be explained by both affectional and relational belonging ( Friedkin, 1984 ; Moody & A ; White, 2003 ) as good by the presence of Simmelian ties. Simmelian ties have already been described as dyadic relationships that are embedded in triadic relationships. They tend to go stronger and more stable over clip ( Krackhardt, 1998 ) and to coerce the web histrions in the couple to conform to the norms of the coteries they belong to ( Krackhardt, 1999 ) , therefore increasing the relational belonging. In add-on, Simmelian ties force web histrions to portion similar positions on organisational world ( Krackhardt & A ; Kilduff, 2002 ) , which besides contributes to coherence of a group.

Davis ( 1963 ) defines a coterie as “ a subset of group members whose mean liking for each other is greater than their mean liking for the other members [ in a group ] ” ( Davis, 1963, p. 451 ) . Research on coteries can be traced back to the Hawthorn experiment in a bank wiring room, where the research workers identified two groups characterized by a peculiar particular organisation and ignorance of occupational specialisation ( Roethlisberger, Dickson, Wright, & A ; Western Electric Company. , 1939 ) . Belonging to these groups impacted non merely voluntary activities such as gap Windowss, occupation trading, and confect sharing but besides group public presentation. Workers in group A developed high public presentation norms, monitored the productiveness of each worker in the coterie and produced more connexions and fewer defects per 100,000 connexions than group B.

From a societal web position, there are several definitions of a coterie. Based on the impressions of graph theory, a coterie is defined as a web construction where “ all the histrions must be straight connected to each other, and all the histrions must hold no direct common nexus to any other histrion ” ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003, p. 46 ) . Therefore, the coterie is a complete subgraph where all web histrions are connected to each other. Harmonizing to Wasserman and Faust ( 1994 ) , merely groups of three or four web histrions can be considered to be a coterie, which excludes common couples by definition.

Such a rigorous definition of a coterie makes coteries scarce in world and forces research workers to loosen up premises of common ties and to develop more practically orientated definitions of coteries such as n-cliques and k-cores. N-cliques are defined as “ groups of histrions who can all make each other through a upper limit of n links ” ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003, p. 46 ) . K-cores besides relax the traditional restricted definition of a coterie. A k-core is a set of web histrions where each member of the group is linked to an n-k figure of web histrions. The value of K has assorted structural deductions for cohesive subgroups in the web. A lower value of K consequences in a larger subgroup size and better boundary line word picture of the subgroup, intending that it is easy to see the boundary lines of the subgroup. A higher value of K consequences in trouble for new members to fall in the k-cores ( Prell, 2012 ) .

Global web degree constructs

Global web degree constructs include denseness, centrality, reciprocality, reachability and transitivity. As I mentioned earlier, each of these constructs represents of import structural features of a web that can be modeled and linked to the peculiar societal, organisational and public direction theories. Furthermore, these planetary web constructs help to separate between webs within one organisation or compare the webs of different organisations ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003 ) . Since reciprocality was already discussed above, I will concentrate on denseness, centrality, reachability, and transitivity.

The denseness of a web compares the figure of bing ties between the web histrions to the figure of maximally possible ties among these web histrions ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . Low denseness webs are called thin webs or sparsely affiliated webs. High denseness webs, on the other manus, bask more connexions or ties among web histrions and are sometimes called dense or extremely connected webs.

Network denseness vitamin D is normally calculated by spliting the existent figure of ties bing in the web ( L ) by the entire figure of possible ties among n figure of web histrions. The higher this proportion is, the denser the web ( see Equation 1 ) .

Equation: Network denseness for non-directed webs

The expression for ciphering denseness in a directed web is different from Equation 1 in that 1 has to cipher all the ties in the denominator ( see Equation 2 ) .

Equation: Network denseness for directed webs

Density can be used for comparing merely webs of the same size due to the fact that increasing the figure of web histrions consequences in an addition of possible ties, and this figure is located in the denominator of the expression for ciphering web denseness. For illustration, if we increase the figure of web histrions from five to eight, the figure of possible ties among these web histrions increases from eight to twenty eight.

Similar to other structural features of webs, the reading of web denseness is besides contingent on the type of the web and the values of other structural features. One of the most popular utilizations of denseness is for mensurating the coherence in the web. A common premise about the relationship between coherence and denseness is that there is a positive correlativity between these two constructs. Simply talking, the higher the denseness of a web, the more cohesive is the web. In pattern, the relationship between denseness and coherence is non that straightforward. Even two webs with an indistinguishable denseness can change in footings of coherence, depending on the centrality of the web ( Prell, 2012 ) . If the high interconnection of a web is caused by higher centrality, it may besides ensue in a higher coherence of the web even in the instance of an indistinguishable denseness. This contradiction of complex relationship between denseness and coherence was confirmed by Provan & A ; Sebastian ( 1998 ) in their survey of the webs of mental wellness bureaus. They found that the denseness of a web had a negative impact on the effectivity of that web. Contrary to the widespread premise about the consequence of denseness on web effectivity, the web with the lowest denseness of connexions yielded the highest effectivity, whereas the highest denseness web had the lowest effectivity.

However, the reappraisal of public direction literature shows that a denseness of public direction and public policy webs sometimes has a positive consequence on organisational results such as the acceptance of inventions. Agranoff and McGuire ‘s ( 1998 ) survey of the structural features of local economic development webs suggested that the denseness of ties among local economic development sections has a positive correlativity with the acceptance of economic development policy.

From an evolutionary position, it is still non clear how the denseness of ties impacts the effectivity of public direction webs. Having examined the impact of conflicting institutional force per unit areas on the development of one community mental wellness system, Provan, Isett, & A ; Milward ( 2004 ) concluded that coaction was accompanied by an increased figure of ties and the strengths and multiplexity of the ties over clip. However, the writers of this survey make no effort to set up the relationship between denseness and web effectivity over clip. This is non surprising sing the fact that denseness is frequently treated as the control variable in organisational web research ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003 )

Centralization is another structural feature widely used in organisational web research. It measures how the web is centralized around one or several web histrions ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) . A web is considered to be centralized if one or several web histrions have really high tonss in centrality. Similarly, if all the web histrions have about the same centrality tonss, this consequences in a decentralised web. Highly centralised webs can be characterized either by a few clustered web histrions with high centrality tonss or by multiple centres in the webs.

Interpretations of centrality are contingent on the types of webs involved. Centralization in the informal webs of an organisation serves as an index of the type of organisation it is. If the informal webs are extremely centralized in an organisation, this may propose that the organisation is mechanistic in nature. However, if the organisation possesses a figure of centres with high degrees of centrality, it may indicate to the organic nature of the organisation ( Shrader et al. , 1989 ) . Burt ‘s ( 1992 ) survey of structural holes suggests that the centrality of organisational webs affects the calling promotion of high ranking work forces. Highly centralized webs tend to decelerate down the calling promotion of high-level work forces, compared to those work forces who are embedded in a low centrality or level web.

Centrality appears to be a good index of the structural development of a public direction web. Having compared four community mental wellness systems, Provan and Milward ( 1995 ) suggested that high web centrality is a structural feature of an effectual web in the phases of executing or execution. An effectual web is characterized by high centralisation at the planetary degree, which in bend facilitates the integrating of all operational activities. Similarly, Provan, Isett, & A ; Milward ‘s 2004 survey, which examined the impact of conflicting institutional force per unit areas on the development of one community mental wellness system, suggests that the strengthening of coaction activities is accompanied by increased centralisation in a public direction web over clip.

Reachability can be defined as “ the mean figure of people reached per individual over all possible stairss ” ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003, p. 32 ) . Reachability has great deductions for web efficiency particularly for communicating webs. In high reachability webs, more people can be reached by messages, utilizing the same figure of intermediate points, than in low reachability webs. Kilduff and Tsai ( 2003, p. 32 ) give an illustration of reachability in an organisation:

If in organisation A, each single contacts friends and friends of friends, and through this two-step procedure all of the people in the organisation are contacted, so A has higher reachability than organisation B in which the same two-step procedure reaches merely 50 per cent of the people ( p. 32 ) .

Network reachability as a structural feature can bespeak both how rapidly norms and values are diffused every bit good as the development of conformity in the organisational web. Compared to low reachability webs, high reachability webs are characterized by a rapid diffusion of norms and values ( Prell, 2012 ) .

The transitivity of webs is another structural belongings of webs at the planetary web degree and is based on the rule “ the friends of my friends are my friends. ” In other words, if friend A has a friendly relationship tie to friend B, and friend B has a friendly relationship tie to friend C, friend A should be friends with friend C. Transitivity can be measured utilizing a transitivity index, which can be determined by spliting the figure of transitive threes by the figure of potentially transitive threes ( Wasserman & A ; Faust, 1994 ) .

Equation: Transitivity Index

Transitivity of webs as a structural belongings at the planetary degree is linked theoretically to equilibrate theory, originally developed as a theory of cognitive consistence ( Heider, 1958 ) for understanding interpersonal constructions in a web. The balance of a web is assessed in footings of the relationship between reciprocality and transitivity. If an organisational or interorganizational web exhibits a leaning for low reciprocality accompanied by high transitivity, this web may be hierarchal, with many stars ( nodes in the web having many ties ) who do non reciprocate ( Kilduff & A ; Tsai, 2003 ) .

Networks with low transitivity may bespeak the presence of fewer coteries in the web. However, the presence of coteries in organisational and interorganizational webs, for case, meshing groups organized around different societal and organisational dimensions, promotes integrity in the organisation, “ because for any given individual there are fewer others who are socially indistinguishable or socially disparate ( Davis, 1963, p. 454 ) . In add-on, the presence of web subgroups prevent the web from going fragmented “ by doing less likely the development of big, cohesive coteries set wholly apart from the remainder of the group ” ( Davis, 1963, p. 454 )

Communication webs with high transitivity besides can be characterized by information propinquity, which can partly explicate the outgrowth of communicating webs. For illustration, if web histrion A communicates with web histrion B, and web histrion B communicates with web histrion C, so web histrion Angstrom is likely to obtain information about and be introduced to web histrion C through interactions with web histrion B.

Drumhead

As the literature reappraisal in this chapter suggests, a span between the procedure theories of web development and the theories of structural attack is necessary if we are to understand the structural development of public direction webs over clip. On the one manus, organisational theory provides a figure of theories to explicate the formation of public direction webs, theories such as resource dependence theory ( Pfeffer & A ; Salancik, 2003 ) , dealing cost economic sciences ( Williamson, 1985, 1986 ) and the popular set of organisational alteration theories including life-cycle theories ( Kanter, 1994 ; Larson, 1992 ; Lowndes & A ; Skelcher, 1998 ) , teleological ( Doz, 1996 ; Ring & A ; van de Ven, 1992, 1994 ) , dialectical ( Benson, 1975 ) and evolutionary theories such as population ecology ( Freeman et al. , 1983 ; Hannan & A ; Freeman, 1977 ) . Procedure theories, nevertheless, provide a limited and disconnected position of the whole procedure of web formation and disregard structural facets of web development such as centrality, reciprocality, transitivity, structural holes and coteries. Social-structure-oriented public direction bookmans, on the other manus, stress the structural facets of public direction webs. They attempt to understand the structural features of efficient and effectual public direction webs at different degrees of analysis, such as single histrion degree, tie degree ( dyad and triad degrees ) , subgroup, and whole web or planetary degree. Few of these surveies, nevertheless, straight look into the structural features of public direction webs at the different phases of web development ( Isett & A ; Provan, 2005 ; Milward, Provan, Fish, Isett, & A ; Huang, 2010 ; Provan, Huang, & A ; Milward, 2009 ; Provan et al. , 2004 ) .

The following chapter reveals a theoretical model for the structural development of public direction webs, utilizing a set of structural hypotheses that describe web development over clip. These hypotheses are based on the structural facets of societal and interorganizational webs, such as centrality, reciprocality, centrality, transitivity, structural holes, and different types of threes, which were discussed in this chapter. These hypotheses reflect temporal alterations in the structural features of public direction webs at different degrees of web development. More significantly, these structural hypotheses link the structural facets at the single histrion, dyadic, triadic, and whole web degrees to relevant sociological, organisation scientific discipline and public direction theories, including some of the theories of web development that were discussed in this chapter.

Agranoff, R. , & A ; McGuire, M. ( 1998 ) . Multinetwork direction: Collaboration and the hollow province in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 8 ( 1 ) , 67-91.

Agranoff, R. , & A ; McGuire, M. ( 2004 ) . Another expression at bargaining and negotiating in intergovernmental direction. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14 ( 4 ) , 495-512.

Ahuja, G. ( 2000 ) . Collaboration webs, structural holes, and invention: A longitudinal survey. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 ( 3 ) , 425-455.

Aldrich, H. ( 1999 ) . Organizations germinating. Thousand Oaks, Calif. ; London: Sage.

Barley, S. R. ( 1990 ) . The alliance of engineering and construction through functions and webs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 ( 1 ) , 61-103.

Barnes, J. A. ( 1979 ) . Network analysis: Orineting impression,